As I read the most recent issue of
The Journal of Religion, Disability, and Health, I found myself
stuck on the article titled
Christian Community and Uncommon Courtesy. This particular work was written in response to a newspaper article which reported all too common occurrences in our places of worship, fear and intolerance to difference. The article described how a young woman, an Individual With Disabilities (IWD) and her mother were asked to leave worship by an usher after the young woman outburst during a time of prayer and communion. As the article reports, the young woman, her mother, and her siblings left church that day never to return.
Bethany McKinney, author of the Journal of Religion, Disability, and Health article, suggests that a number of wrongs were written that day and that the congregation not only sent a negative message to the young woman and her family, but also impeded their own growth.
In her article, McKinney suggests that there are several reasons why a congregation should include a 'disruptive' person in worship, the first of which examines the term disabled. McKinney suggests, as do others in the field, that each of us are
temporarily able-bodied persons (Nancy Eiesland), that at one point in our lives whether due to physical injury, brain disorder, aging, or even allergies, each of us will in someway experience what it means to be disabled. Building on the concept of being
temporarily able-bodied, McKinney goes on to suggest that, 'welcoming people with disabilities, even when deeply inconvenient, can be a self-serving exercise in empathy.'(288) That, 'by relating to people with disabilities in their midst, members of (the) congregation[s] have the opportunity to deepen their empathic skills and to become more honest and loving toward their own bodies.' (289) Secondly, McKinney suggests that 'worshiping among people with developmental disabilities often means there is an element of unpredictability inherent in the service,' (298) but that we are each called to remember that, 'in worship the church is made vulnerable to a God that would rule this world not by coercion but through the unpredictability of love.' (Hauerwas)
For McKinney, the solution to the aforementioned problems lies in a renewed
faithful imagination on the part of the worshiping community. McKinney suggests that while the differences of the young girl mentioned in the article 'included loud shrieks and screams during some quieter moments of the worship service, and that this event could prove quite disconcerting for others, this reality, however does not excuse the community from visioning for ways to include her in their time or worship. Her differences, incompatible as they may seem with many of the traditional elements of a Sunday morning service, do not take her beyond the possibility of inclusion. Rather they call the receiving community to a deeper level of imagination as they struggle to find a way to be faithful members of the household of God.' (304)
While many have weighed in on the the ethical dilemma of the young woman and the congregation, few have discussed what
faithful imagination might occur within congregations. So what does McKinney's suggestion mean for congregations? I would suggest that it means creativity, flexibility, and an openness to allowing the Holy Spirit to move through the congregation. That it means developing relationships (
...and we're back) and educational opportunities among the members of the worshiping community (
Those who have gone before us.). That it means finding ways to lift-up the gifts of all members of the community in a variety of ways, both in worship and within the communities life (
JOY!).
So as we continue on this journey, consider how you might encourage your congregations
faithful imagination both in ministering with IWD and with the greater congregation.